Architecture, Features, FAQs¶
nGraph Compiler stack architecture¶
The diagram below represents our current Beta release stack. In the diagram, nGraph components are colored in gray. Please note that the stack diagram is simplified to show how nGraph executes deep learning workloads with two hardware backends; however, many other deep learning frameworks and backends currently are functioning.
Starting from the top of the stack, nGraph receives a computational graph from a deep learning framework such as TensorFlow* or MXNet*. The computational graph is converted to an nGraph internal representation by a bridge created for the corresponding framework.
An nGraph bridge examines the whole graph to pattern match subgraphs which nGraph knows how to execute, and these subgraphs are encapsulated. Parts of the graph that are not encapsulated will default to framework implementation when executed.
nGraph uses a strongly-typed and platform-neutral
Intermediate Representation (IR) to construct a “stateless”
computational graph. Each node, or op, in the graph corresponds to one
step in a computation, where each step produces zero or more tensor
outputs from zero or more tensor inputs.
This allows nGraph to apply its state of the art optimizations instead of having to follow how a particular framework implements op execution, memory management, data layouts, etc.
In addition, using nGraph IR allows faster optimization delivery for many of the supported frameworks. For example, if nGraph optimizes ResNet* for TensorFlow, the same optimization can be readily applied to MXNet or ONNX* implementations of ResNet*.
Hybrid transformer takes the nGraph IR, and partitions it into subgraphs, which can then be assigned to the best-performing backend. There are two hardware backends shown in the stack diagram to demonstrate this graph partitioning. The Hybrid transformer assigns complex operations (subgraphs) to Intel® Nervana™ Neural Network Processor (NNP) to expedite the computation, and the remaining operations default to CPU. In the future, we will further expand the capabilities of Hybrid transformer by enabling more features, such as localized cost modeling and memory sharing.
Once the subgraphs are assigned, the corresponding backend will execute the IR.
Focusing our attention on the CPU backend, when the IR is passed to the
Intel® Architecture (IA) transformer, it can be executed in two modes:
Direct EXecution (DEX) and code generation (
codegen mode, nGraph generates and compiles code which can either
call into highly optimized kernels like MKL-DNN or JITers like Halide.
Although our team wrote kernels for nGraph for some operations, nGraph
leverages existing kernel libraries such as MKL-DNN, Eigen, and MLSL.
MLSL library is called when nGraph executes distributed training. At the time of the nGraph Beta release, nGraph achieved state of the art results for ResNet50 with 16 nodes and 32 nodes for TensorFlow* and MXNet*. We are excited to continue our work in enabling distributed training, and we plan to expand to 256 nodes in Q4 ‘18. Additionally, we are testing model parallelism in addition to data parallelism.
The other mode of execution is Direct EXecution (DEX). In DEX mode,
nGraph can execute the operations by directly calling associated kernels
as it walks though the IR instead of compiling via
mode reduces the compilation time, and it will be useful for training,
deploying, and retraining a deep learning workload in production. In our
tests, DEX mode reduced ResNet50 compilation time by 30X.
nGraph further tries to speed up the computation by leveraging multi-threading and graph scheduling libraries such as OpenMP and TBB Flow Graph.
nGraph performs a combination of device-specific and non-device-specific optimizations:
- Fusion – Fuse multiple ops to to decrease memory usage.
- Data layout abstraction – Make abstraction easier and faster with nGraph translating element order to work best for a given or available device.
- Data reuse – Save results and reuse for subgraphs with the same input.
- Graph scheduling – Run similar subgraphs in parallel via multi-threading.
- Graph partitioning – Partition subgraphs to run on different devices to speed up computation; make better use of spare CPU cycles with nGraph.
- Memory management – Prevent peak memory usage by intercepting a graph with or by a “saved checkpoint,” and to enable data auditing.
- Data layout abstraction – Make abstraction easier and faster with nGraph translating element order to work best for whatever given or available device.
The value we’re offering to the developer community is empowerment: we are confident that Intel® Architecture already provides the best computational resources available for the breadth of ML/DL tasks.
How does it work?¶
The nGraph Core uses a strongly-typed and platform-neutral Intermediate Representation to construct a “stateless” graph. Each node, or op, in the graph corresponds to one step in a computation, where each step produces zero or more tensor outputs from zero or more tensor inputs.
How do I connect a framework?¶
The nGraph Library manages framework bridges for some of the more widely-known frameworks. A bridge acts as an intermediary between the nGraph core and the framework, and the result is a function that can be compiled from a framework. A fully-compiled function that makes use of bridge code thus becomes a “function graph”, or what we sometimes call an nGraph graph.
See List of Core ops to learn about Core Ops.
Our design philosophy is that the graph is not a script for running kernels;
rather, our compilation will match
ops to appropriate available kernels
(or when available, such as with CPU cycles). Thus, we expect that adding of
new Core ops should be infrequent and that most functionality instead gets
added with new functions that build sub-graphs from existing core ops.
For a more detailed dive into how custom bridge code can be implemented, see our documentation on how to Execute a computation. To learn how TensorFlow and MXNet currently make use of custom bridge code, see the section on Current framework integrations.
How do I run an inference model?¶
Framework bridge code is not the only way to connect a model (function graph) to nGraph’s List of Core ops. We’ve also built an importer for models that have been exported from a framework and saved as serialized file, such as ONNX. To learn how to convert such serialized files to an nGraph model, please see the Import a model documentation.